1140 19th Street NW, Suite 400
Washington, DC 20036
Or by email to: callforcomments@caepnet.org
-
-
- In CAEP’s performance-based system, accreditation is based on evidence that demonstrates that teacher candidates know the subject matter and can teach it effectively so that students learn. In the CAEP system, EPPs must prove that candidates can connect theory to practice and be effective in an actual P-12 classroom
- A professional education provider that is accredited by CAEP is expected to be involved in ongoing planning and evaluation; engaged in continuous assessment and development; ensure that faculty and programs reflect new knowledge, practice, and technologies; and be involved in continuous development in response to the evolving world of education and educational reform.
-
Comments must address substantive matters related to the quality of professional education programs offered, and should specify the respondent’s relationship, if any, to the institution (i.e., graduate, present or former faculty member, employer of graduates). Copies of all correspondence received will be sent to the university for comment prior to the review.
-
CAEP Accountability Measures
(Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation) has four annual reporting measures, which are used to provide information to the public on program outcome and program impact. Below are the reporting measures for our undergraduate initial certification programs with links to data tables that provide supporting evidence for each measure:
Data in progress.
1.Completer Effectiveness
2. Satisfaction of Employees and Stakeholder Involvement
3. Candidate Competency at Completion
4. Ability to be Hired
Former CAEP Annual Measures: 2018-2021
1.Impact on P-12 learning and development
- 2018-2019: Measure 1 Student Learning Objectives
- 2018-2019: Measure 1 ADEPT Results
- 2019-2020: Measure 1 Student Learning Objectives
- 2019-2020: Measure 1 ADEPT Results
- 2020-2021: Measure 1 Student Learning Objectives
- 2020-2021: Measure 1 ADEPT Results
2. Indicators of teaching effectiveness
3. Satisfaction of employers and employment milestones
- 2018-2019: Measure 3 Principal Survey
- 2019-2020: Measure 3: Principal Survey
- 2020-2021: Measure 3 Principal Survey
4. Satisfaction of completers
- 2017-2018: Measure 4 Alumni Survey
- 2018-2019: Measure 4 Alumni Survey
- 2019-2020: Measure 4 Alumni Survey
- 2020-2021: Measure 4 Alumni Survey
5. Graduation Rates
- 2017-2018: Measure 5 Graduation Rates
- 2018-2019 Measure 5 Graduation Rates
- 2019-2020 Measure 5: Graduation Rates
- 2020-2021 Measure 5 Graduation Rates
6. Ability of completers to meet licensing requirements and additional state requirements
- 2017-2018 Measure 6: GPA
- 2018-2019 Measure 6: GPA
- 2019-2020 Measure 6: GPA
- 2016-2019 Measure 6: State Licensure Results
- 2019-2020 Measure 6: Ability to Meet State Requirements
- 2020-2021 Measure 6 GPA
- 2020-2021 Measure 6 Ability to Meet State Requirements
7. Ability of completers to be hired in education positions for which they have prepared
- 2017-2018 Measure 7: Ability to be Hire
- 2018-2019 Measure 7: Ability to be Hired
- 2019-2020 Measure 7: Ability to be Hired
- 2020-2021 Measure 7: Ability to be Hired
8. Student loan default rates and other consumer information (initial level)
Accrediting Agencies
Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP)
National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS)
Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI)
National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC)
National Association for Sport and Physical Education (NASPE)
National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE)